Home Delhi CBI Alleges ‘Vitriolic Campaign’ Against Justice Sharma by Kejriwal in Delhi High Court
DelhiLegal News

CBI Alleges ‘Vitriolic Campaign’ Against Justice Sharma by Kejriwal in Delhi High Court

CBI tells Delhi High Court that a targeted online campaign is being run against Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma by Arvind Kejriwal and others.

Share
CBI Kejriwal Justice Sharma case, Delhi High Court judge controversy, Swarana Kanta Sharma conflict row, CBI online campaign allegations, Kejriwal judiciary controversy news
Share

CBI Flags Alleged Campaign Against Judge

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has told the Delhi High Court that a “premeditated and vitriolic” online campaign is being run against Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma.

The agency alleged that the campaign is being carried out at the behest of Arvind Kejriwal and others to exert pressure on the judge.

Claims of Misinformation Circulation

In its written submissions, the CBI said that selective and misleading information is being circulated on social media.

The agency pointed out that “wild insinuations” related to alleged government panel work involving the judge’s children are being spread without basis.

Kejriwal Had Alleged Conflict of Interest

The development comes after Kejriwal claimed that Justice Sharma had a “direct conflict of interest” in a case being heard.

The CBI, however, strongly rejected these claims and termed the campaign as an attempt to influence judicial proceedings.

Warning Against Dangerous Precedent

The agency cautioned that if a judge recuses due to such “orchestrated social media campaigns,” it would set a dangerous precedent for the judiciary.

It described such actions as “unholy, unhealthy and anarchist practices” that must be curbed in the larger interest of maintaining judicial independence.

Matter Under Court Consideration

The issue is currently under consideration before the Delhi High Court, and further proceedings are awaited.

The case has sparked debate over the use of social media in influencing judicial processes and the need to safeguard the integrity of the judiciary.

Share
Written by
Indra Shiva - Editor in Chief

Indra Shiva is the Founder and Editor-in-Chief of IMN India, a Delhi-based national digital news media network. He oversees editorial strategy, breaking news coverage, and content standards across the platform. Alongside his media venture, he is the Founder and CEO of Luxury Shukra, a premium women’s ethnic wear brand. His work focuses on delivering timely, accurate, and trustworthy news content, contributing to the growth of independent digital journalism in India.

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles
Lok Sabha passes the Supreme Court Judges Amendment Bill 2026 to increase the sanctioned strength of Supreme Court judges.
Legal NewsNew Delhi

Lok Sabha Passes Supreme Court Judges Amendment Bill 2026 to Expand Apex Court Strength

Lok Sabha passes legislation increasing the sanctioned strength of Supreme Court judges...

supreme court judicial officers retirement age 61
Legal News

Supreme Court Asks States to Consider Raising Retirement Age of Judicial Officers to 61 Years

The Supreme Court has directed states and Union Territories to consider increasing...

Ram Temple donation theft case, Supreme Court Ayodhya donation case, CJI Surya Kant, SIT Ram Temple probe, Ayodhya temple fund embezzlement, Uttar Pradesh SIT investigation, Ram Mandir donation case hearing, CJI surya kant
NationalLegal News

CJI Surya Kant Assures Fair Probe in Ram Temple Donation Case, Seeks SIT Reinforcement

Chief Justice Surya Kant-led Bench asks Uttar Pradesh government whether existing SIT...