“Other Than Sermons, What Research?”: Supreme Court Questions Petitioner on Food Safety PIL

New Delhi: The Supreme Court of India on Monday questioned a petitioner over the lack of substantial research in a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking stricter food safety enforcement across the country.

⚖️ Court Questions Petitioner

A bench comprising Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta asked the petitioner to clarify the basis of the plea.

“Other than sermons, what is the averment and what is the research you have done before filing this petition?” the bench remarked.

🧾 PIL on Food Safety Measures

The PIL sought the constitution of a national task force or committee to monitor and ensure effective compliance with food safety regulations.

It also requested directions for a nationwide, time-bound audit and inspection drive covering food manufacturing units, processing centres, restaurants, and other commercial establishments.

🗣️ Petitioner’s Argument

Appearing in person, the petitioner argued that the issue raised in the plea affects a large section of the population.

“This is affecting almost every citizen,” the petitioner said, highlighting concerns over unsafe, contaminated, and hazardous food.

⏳ Order Reserved

After hearing the arguments, the Supreme Court reserved its order and indicated that a detailed judgment will be passed.

📊 Context

Food safety remains a critical public health issue in India, with periodic concerns over contamination, hygiene standards, and enforcement of regulations.

🧩 Conclusion

The court’s observations underline the importance of well-researched petitions in matters of public interest, even as it considers the broader issue of food safety enforcement across the country.